Our work·Evidence and evaluation
Eighteen months of implementation. What actually made it work?.
Commissioned by the NHS to evaluate the journey and the learning from 18 months of implementation work with GP TeamNet across multiple practices, and to turn it into implementation guidelines that support national spread.
GP TeamNet. Digital health: learning evaluation and implementation guidelines.
What happened, and what came of it.
GP TeamNet had been implemented across multiple practices in a regional programme.
The aim was to work closely with those practices to understand what works well and what does not in implementing it, and to develop an implementation guide so the successful methods could spread.
We evaluated the journey, then developed a comprehensive learning guide, disseminated regionally both as a report and as a graphically summarised learning aid.
The guide continues to be shared with GP practices across the UK seeking to succeed with the technology.
The learning from the project supported further significant funding into the regional innovation.
More of the work
Related cases.
A selection from the same strand. The wider archive is on the our work page.
From the same strand
Dorset Whole Schools Approach
Dorset Public Health
A county-wide evaluation of the Whole Schools Approach innovation funding strategy taken by Dorset Public Health. A full-scale evaluation process, a learning guide, and a regional webinar delivered back to every stakeholder, so the learning stayed in the county.
Risk communication in neurology
NIHR and the University of Exeter
An 18-month NIHR-funded project with the University of Exeter, exploring how clinicians and people with epilepsy talk about risk in NHS clinics. It applies conversation analysis, a specialist method for revealing how communication actually works, to show how different phrasings change what a patient hears.
SUDEP and Seizure Safety Checklist
SUDEP Action and the checklist development group
A free, evidence-based tool that helps UK clinicians hold a real conversation about epilepsy risk in the clinic. Craig sits on the Adult Checklist Development Group, and our research team published the case-control validation of the risk factors it asks about, and the studies of what happens when clinicians actually use it.
Start the conversation
Something like this on your desk?
Tell us what you are trying to land and we will say honestly whether we have done something close to it before, and what we would formulate first.
30 minutes · Senior psychologist · No preparation needed