Our work·Evidence and evaluation
A conversation nobody was having. Now more than 2,000 clinicians have it.
The SUDEP and Seizure Safety Checklist is a free, evidence-based tool created by SUDEP Action with Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, and supported by a UK-wide development group of clinicians, researchers and people living with epilepsy. Craig sits on that group, and our research validated the risk factors the tool asks about.
SUDEP and Seizure Safety Checklist. Evidence and expert advisory: validating a national clinical risk tool.

What happened, and what came of it.
People with epilepsy can only make good decisions about their own safety if someone tells them what the risks are. Bereaved families, charities and clinicians all reported the same gap: those conversations were not reliably happening in the clinic.
Where the conversation did happen, it had no shared structure. Key questions got lost in short appointments, and there was no baseline against which a person's changing risk could be compared at the next visit.
SUDEP Action and Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust created the Checklist, and it has been supported since 2015 by a UK-wide development group of GPs, neurologists, specialist nurses, researchers and people living with epilepsy. Craig sits on that group as a clinical psychologist, bringing the behavioural and human-factors side of the question: not what the tool should ask, but whether people can actually use it under clinic conditions.
Alongside the advisory role, our research team ran the studies that put evidence underneath the tool: a case-control study testing whether the risk factors on the Checklist are the ones that actually predict harm, and further work on what changes when clinicians use it in practice.
The Checklist is used regularly by more than 2,000 clinicians and is available to over half of GP surgeries in England.
SUDEP Action report that its use raised risk discussions within epilepsy services from 10% to 80%.
The validation and implementation studies are published and citable, which is what lets a clinical tool of this kind be adopted at national scale rather than recommended locally.
The published record
5 peer-reviewed papers.
The work behind this project, in the journals that reviewed it. Each one carries its DOI, so you can read it rather than take our word for it.
- 2016
Steps to prevent SUDEP: the validity of risk factors in the SUDEP and Seizure Safety Checklist, a case control study
Journal of Neurology
doi:10.1007/s00415-016-8203-3 - 2018
Decreasing the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: structured communication of risk factors for premature mortality
European Journal of Neurology
doi:10.1111/ene.13651 - 2018
Has the time come to stratify and score SUDEP risk to inform people with epilepsy of their changes in safety?
Frontiers in Neurology
doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00281 - 2018
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in children: a focused review of incidence and risk factors
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-317702 - 2020
Bridging the gap of risk communication and management using the SUDEP and Seizure Safety Checklist
Epilepsy & Behavior
doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.07.020
More of the work
Related cases.
A selection from the same strand. The wider archive is on the our work page.
From the same strand

Dorset Whole Schools Approach
Dorset Public Health
A county-wide evaluation of the Whole Schools Approach innovation funding strategy taken by Dorset Public Health. A full-scale evaluation process, a learning guide, and a regional webinar delivered back to every stakeholder, so the learning stayed in the county.

Risk communication in neurology
NIHR and the University of Exeter
An 18-month NIHR-funded project with the University of Exeter, exploring how clinicians and people with epilepsy talk about risk in NHS clinics. It applies conversation analysis, a specialist method for revealing how communication actually works, to show how different phrasings change what a patient hears.

GP TeamNet
Regional NHS implementation programme
We evaluated the journey and the learning from 18 months of implementation work with GP TeamNet, then turned it into implementation guidelines written to support national NHS spread.
Start the conversation
Something like this on your desk?
Tell us what you are trying to land and we will say honestly whether we have done something close to it before, and what we would formulate first.
30 minutes · Senior psychologist · No preparation needed